Re: compile or not compile

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: llewelly@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: compile or not compile
From: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 08:58:37 -0500
Cc: karol@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <s3r1xju4j3j.fsf@solaris.xmission.com>
References: <40E414CC.5090004@mikronika.com.pl> <6.1.1.1.2.20040701085901.021748f0@iplan-mn.corp.adobe.com> <40E478AA.5030603@mikronika.com.pl> <s3r7jtn2bl5.fsf@solaris.xmission.com> <40E5183C.2080606@mikronika.com.pl> <6.1.1.1.2.20040702071541.033448d8@iplan-mn.corp.adobe.com> <s3r1xju4j3j.fsf@solaris.xmission.com>
Sender: gcc-help-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx

Hi,

>hm. So if a type is both POD and UDT, what do you do?

I didn't know that was possible, in C++.

(Keep in mind that "typedef" does not introduce a new type, it merely introduces an alias.)

--Eljay

Follow-Ups:
- Re: compile or not compile
  - From: llewelly

References:
- compile or not compile
  - From: Karo Szkudlarek
- Re: compile or not compile
  - From: Eljay Love-Jensen
- Re: compile or not compile
  - From: Karol Szkudlarek
- Re: compile or not compile
  - From: llewelly
- Re: compile or not compile
  - From: Karol Szkudlarek
- Re: compile or not compile
  - From: Eljay Love-Jensen
- Re: compile or not compile
  - From: llewelly

Prev by Date: Re: compile or not compile
Next by Date: RE: Error Compiling gcc 3.2 on AIX 4.3.3
Previous by thread: Re: compile or not compile
Next by thread: Re: compile or not compile
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux