RE: gcc shared versus static

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



If you don't have libctdc++ installed on the host machine (along with libgcc)
gcc and linker will look for the static libraries.

----
Lev Assinovsky
Aelita Software Corporation
O&S InTrust Framework Division, Team Leader
ICQ# 165072909


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nizar ROMDHANE [mailto:nizar.romdhane@xxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 3:02 PM
> To: gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: gcc shared versus static
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I would like to know the difference between compiling gcc with 
> --enable-shared and with --disable-shared?
> 
> Infact I would like to generate a stand alone binary with no need to 
> have libctdc++ installed on the host machine. If I compile gcc with 
> --disable-shared and then use it to compile my project (c++ project) 
> into a binary, will it be stand alone? If not how can I have this (of 
> course if possible)
> 
> Thanks a lot
> Cheers
> 
> -- 
> -----------------------------------------
> Nizar ROMDHANE       			
> System Level Design Engineer
> SLD Team Leader - OCCS - CMG Design - CMG  		
> STMicroelectronics Tunis        	
> Cite Technologique des communications -	
> Elghazala - 2088 - Ariana - TUNISIA	
> phone:	+216 71 857 750 (office 131)
> mobile: +216 97 431 708	
> fax:	+216 71 857 525			
> e-mail:	nizar.romdhane@xxxxxx		
> 	nizar_romdane@xxxxxxxx		
> web:	http://www.st.com		
> -----------------------------------------
> 
> 


[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux