Thanks. Well seems good old RH did not include it on the CD (as I was told and the links indicated), Loaded everything and looked on the disks, I can't find it. I've had a support request into RH for 7+ days now. Any one else have problems with RH? Thanks, Frank Miguel Angel Nuñez wrote: > Frank, > > Executable name is snavigator. At least in Solaris, I suppose in linux it is > the same. > > Miguel Angel. > > El Mié 30 Jul 2003 00:25, Frank escribió: > > Tony, > > Do you know the executable name for the Source Navigator? I can't find > > anything that looks even remotely like it would be it on the new RT > > install. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Frank > > > > Tony Wetmore wrote: > > > Frank, > > > > > > GNUPro was (and perhaps still is) the name of a product distributed and > > > supported by Cygnus Solutions (later bought by Red Hat) that provided > > > pre-built and tested versions of the GNU toolchain, along with the > > > Source Navigator code comprehension tool. > > > > > > At one of my previous jobs, we purchased the GNUPro toolset in order to > > > have a supported version of the GNU toolchain with which to build our > > > software. > > > > > > Along with the rest of the GNU tools, Source Navigator is (now) an open > > > source tool. > > > > > > So is GNUPro nothing more than a CD with all the GNU tools on it? Well > > > yes and no. No, it doesn't provide any additional software (to my > > > knowledge). But yes, it is "something more." It is a pre-configured, > > > built and tested set of (integrated) software tools. So you do not have > > > to worry about downloading, configuring, building and testing the tools > > > for yourself. For many people (and especially businesses), there is > > > value added in such a product. For many others, it's not a service they > > > are willing to pay for. > > > > > > Though you have probably already found it, here is a link to exactly > > > what GNUPro contains: > > > > > > http://www.redhat.com/software/gnupro/technical/detailschart.html > > > > > > Personally, I have used Source Navigator quite a bit. I have not yet > > > found a "better" IDE for my own C++ development on Unix/Linux. My > > > definition of "better" is not based on features provided, speed, > > > integrated-ness or anything measurable. It is completely subjective and > > > is based on my own personal development style and the projects on which > > > I work. > > > > > > I have tried many IDEs and have always ended up dumping them for one > > > reason or another. I may not like the way an IDE manages projects, or I > > > may not like the editor, or I may not like the way code/symbol > > > navigation works, or whatever. I always manage to come back to Source > > > Navigator, even though it may not do everything exactly as I would want > > > it to. For me, it's the best tool for the job, since I haven't yet > > > found the time to write my own IDE. > > > > > > As I'm sure you already know, there are many C++ IDEs for Linux, most of > > > them available at no cost. Each has its own set of features and quirks, > > > and every developer will have their own personal favorite. You should > > > try out as many as possible and find the one best suited to your > > > needs/desires. > > > > > > Other IDEs you may want to investigate: > > > > > > - Eclipse (www.eclipse.org): Open-source IDE for Java with > > > plug-ins for other languages, such as C++. I have not used > > > it for C++ development (yet), but it absolutely rocks for doing > > > Java development. > > > > > > - Metrowerks Code Warrior (www.metrowerks.com): Commercial IDE that > > > is used in many different industries on many different platforms, > > > including Linux. I have not used it, but I keep meaning to > > > evalute it. It costs $149, $49 if you are looking for an > > > academic license. > > > > > > - Visual Slick Edit (www.slickedit.com): Commercial text editor > > > with an amazing amount of flexibility and power. It offers many > > > of the same features you would find in an IDE. You can > > > download an evaluation copy for Windows and use that for 30 > > > days. The Linux version is essentially identical, but they > > > do not offer a full-evaluation version. The license is $269 > > > per platform. This is my editor of choice at home, but I do > > > not have it at work, so back to Source Navigator and XEmacs > > > I went. ;) > > > > > > I hope this helps you in your search. Good luck! > > > > > > --- > > > Tony Wetmore > > > Raytheon Solipsys > > > mailto:tony.wetmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > > http://www.solipsys.com > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: gcc-help-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gcc-help-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx] On > > > Behalf Of Frank > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 12:06 PM > > > To: LLeweLLyn Reese > > > Cc: GNU GCC help list > > > Subject: Re: Looking for a C++ development tool > > > > > > Is GNUPro nothing more then a CD with all the GNU tools on it? I.e. it > > > provides no value added? I.e. not a integrated development environment > > > like Kdevelop or Sun's Studio? > > > > > > LLeweLLyn Reese wrote: > > > > Frank <fgeck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > > I'm looking for a C++ development tool/GUI for Linux or Solaris and > > > > > if it uses GNU g++ probably all the better. Looking for some things > > > > > > > > > > similar to the sun workshop/stuidio developer environment. Want > > > > > something that helps you interactively debug a program from a run > > > > > time and compile time etc. Looking for something under $1000 > > > > > probably. Any suggestions? > > > > > > > > The ones I've heard good things about are KDevelop and GNUpro. Of > > > > course, I don't use either of these, I use emacs.
