Re: [PATCH 1/4] generic/363: remove _supported_fs xfs

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 07:58:25AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Run this test for all file systems.  Just because they are broken doesn't
> mean that zeroing should not be tested.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> ---
>  tests/generic/363 | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/generic/363 b/tests/generic/363
> index 477c111ccb60..74226a458427 100755
> --- a/tests/generic/363
> +++ b/tests/generic/363
> @@ -13,9 +13,6 @@ _begin_fstest rw auto
>  
>  _require_test
>  
> -# currently only xfs performs enough zeroing to satisfy fsx
> -_supported_fs xfs
> -

IIRC pretty much every fs except for xfs failed this test when I wrote
it, so I didn't want to drop it on folks until I had a chance to look
into it. I had pending ext4 fixes which appear to have now been merged,
so on a quick test of -rc2 this now passes on ext4.

I haven't got to the others, but if it's particularly disruptive for
anybody I suppose it could still be excluded easy enough:

Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>

>  # on failure, replace -q with -d to see post-eof writes in the dump output
>  run_fsx "-q -S 0 -e 1 -N 100000"
>  
> -- 
> 2.45.2
> 
> 





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux