Hi, All,
Sorry for the delay relay(something happened, and cannot use pc
before...).
在 2024/7/21 1:26, Filipe Manana 写道:
On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 9:38 AM Yang Erkun <yangerkun@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
We use offset_readdir for tmpfs, and every we call rename, the offset
for the parent dir will increase by 1. So for tmpfs we will always
fail since the infinite readdir.
Having an infinite readdir sounds like a bug, or at least an
inconvenience and surprising for users.
We had that problem in btrfs which affected users/applications, see:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/2c8c55ec-04c6-e0dc-9c5c-8c7924778c35@xxxxxxxxxxx/
which was surprising for them since every other filesystem they
used/tested didn't have that problem.
Why not fix tmpfs?
Thanks for all your advise, I will give a detail analysis first(maybe
until last week I can do it), and after we give a conclusion about does
this behavior a bug or something expected to occur, I will choose the
next step!
Thanks again for all your advise!
Thanks.
Signed-off-by: Yang Erkun <yangerkun@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
tests/generic/736 | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/generic/736 b/tests/generic/736
index d2432a82..9fafa8df 100755
--- a/tests/generic/736
+++ b/tests/generic/736
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ _cleanup()
rm -fr $target_dir
}
-_supported_fs generic
+_supported_fs generic ^tmpfs
_require_test
_require_test_program readdir-while-renames
--
2.39.2
