Re: [PATCH 03/10] generic/710: repurpose this for exchangerange vs. quota testing

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 11:08:37PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 05:47:32PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > The exchange-range implementation is now completely separate from the
> > old swapext ioctl.  We're deprecating the old swapext ioctl, so let's
> > move this test to use exchangerange.
> 
> Do we really want to lost the swapext test coverage?  Even if it is
> deprecated, it will be with us for a long time.  My vote for copy and
> pasting this into a new test for exchrange.

Yeah, you're right that we should retain this test for the old swapext
ioctl.  I'll fork the test into two -- one for swapext, another for
exchangerange.

--D




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux