On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 05:42:08PM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote: > Hmm, what kind of situation is this _expected_failure for? Well, the one we are talking about here. We have a new and useful test, and a file systems fails it because it has a bug. Personally I'd be fine with just letting it fail, but you seemed to indicate that this is a reason to not merge the test yet. > I hope we can fix the obvious case issue in reviewing phase, or deal with the > failure by 1) or 2). For this patch, I think we can find a way to avoid the > failure for btrfs, or let this test "not supported" by btrfs. Or any other > better ideas :) It is a normal use case that every file system should handle and btrfs developers are looking into it, but it might take a while.
