[really annoying multi-level full quote snipped] On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 04:51:35PM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote: > I remembered you metioned btrfs fails on this test, and I can reproduce it > on btrfs [1] with general disk. Have you figured out the reason? I don't > want to give btrfs a test failure suddently without a proper explanation :) > If it's a case issue, better to fix it for btrfs. As a rule of thumb, what do we about generally useful tests that fail on a fs due to fs bugs? Not adding the test seems a bit counter productive. Do we need a _expected_failure $FSTYP helper to annotate them instead of blocking the test?
