Currently, this case fails on old xfsprogs as below: +/var/lib/xfstests/tests/xfs/270: line 51: [: !=: unary operator expected Getting ro_compat value will report the following error after setting new ro_compat value: +cache_purge: shake on cache 0x56033fde4920 left 1 nodes!? +cache_purge: shake on cache 0x56033fde4920 left 1 nodes!? +cache_zero_check: refcount is 1, not zero (node=0x56033fdf9110 Old xfsprogs miss a bugfix f4afdcb0ad ("xfs_db: clean up the salvage read callsites in set_cur()"). Here we skip the get step of new ro_comap value when nrext64 feature is supported. Also will add a new test to cover this xfsprog bug. Signed-off-by: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- tests/xfs/270 | 23 ++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/xfs/270 b/tests/xfs/270 index b740c379..5ff83ead 100755 --- a/tests/xfs/270 +++ b/tests/xfs/270 @@ -22,6 +22,10 @@ _require_scratch_nocheck # Only V5 XFS disallow rw mount/remount with unknown ro-compat features _require_scratch_xfs_crc +nrext64_supported=0 +_scratch_mkfs_xfs_supported -m crc=1 -i nrext64 > /dev/null 2>&1 && \ + nrext64_supported=1 + _scratch_mkfs_xfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 # set the highest bit of features_ro_compat, use it as an unknown @@ -43,13 +47,18 @@ ro_compat=$(echo $ro_compat | \ _scratch_xfs_set_metadata_field "features_ro_compat" "$ro_compat" "sb 0" \ > $seqres.full 2>&1 -# read the newly set ro compat filed for verification -new_ro_compat=$(_scratch_xfs_get_metadata_field "features_ro_compat" "sb 0" \ - 2>/dev/null) - -# verify the new ro_compat field is correct. -if [ $new_ro_compat != $ro_compat ]; then - echo "Unable to set new features_ro_compat. Wanted $ro_compat, got $new_ro_compat" +# Indeed, xfsprogs has a bug here and fixed by commit f4afdcb +# ("xfs_db: clean up the salvage read callsites in set_cur()") +# Here, we use nrext64 feature as a proxy. +if [ $nrext64_supported -eq 1 ]; then + # read the newly set ro compat filed for verification + new_ro_compat=$(_scratch_xfs_get_metadata_field "features_ro_compat" \ + "sb 0" 2>/dev/null) + # verify the new ro_compat field is correct. + if [ $new_ro_compat != $ro_compat ]; then + echo "Unable to set new features_ro_compat. Wanted $ro_compat, \ + got $new_ro_compat" + fi fi # rw mount with unknown ro-compat feature should fail -- 2.27.0