Eryu Guan <guan@xxxxxxx> wrote: > _require_mknod checks for mknod support by trying to mknod and _notrun > the test if mknod fails. > > So does afs return any failure like EOPNOTSUPP? If so I think we could > refactor _require_mknod into something like afs doesn't provide a ->mknod implementation as it doesn't support anything you'd create with it, so you get the VFS default in such an instance - which would be EPERM. David
