Re: [PATCH v10 1/6] generic/631: add test for detached mount propagation

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 9:50 AM Christian Brauner
<christian.brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 09:40:50AM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 3:46 PM Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Regression test to verify that creating a series of detached mounts,
> > > attaching them to the filesystem, and unmounting them does not trigger an
> > > integer overflow in ns->mounts causing the kernel to block any new mounts in
> > > count_mounts() and returning ENOSPC because it falsely assumes that the
> > > maximum number of mounts in the mount namespace has been reached, i.e. it
> > > thinks it can't fit the new mounts into the mount namespace anymore.
> > >
> > > The test is written in a way that it will leave the host's mount
> > > namespace intact so we are sure to never make the host's mount namespace
> > > unuseable!
> > >
> > > Link: https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/ee2e3f50629f17b0752b55b2566c15ce8dafb557
> > > Cc: Eryu Guan <guan@xxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > /* v1 - v8 */
> > > patch not present
> > >
> > > /* v9 */
> > > - Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> > >   - Rebased on current master.
> > >
> > > /* v10 */
> > > - Eryu Guan <guan@xxxxxxx>:
> > >   - Add missing checks whether test is supported.
> > >   - Move status=$? assignment up.
> > > ---
> >
> > Technical nit: why did you add this extra --- line?
> > It causes all the patch changelog to appear in the commit message.
> > I don't think that was your intention? and I don't think it adds valuable
> > into to git log.
>
> I've not done that in any of the other patches or on any other patches I
> ever wrote so I think this was just a copy-paste error when I updated
> the changelog.
>

Please note this glitch happened in all the patches in the series...

Thanks,
Amir.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux