Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] fsstress,fsx: add io_uring test and do some fix

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 02:30:28PM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote:
> This patchset tries to add new IO_URING test into fsstress [1/4] and fsx [4/4].
> And then do some changes and bug fix by the way [2/4 and 3/4].
> 
> fsstress and fsx are important tools in xfstests to do filesystem I/Os test,
> lots of test cases use it. So add IO_URING operation into fsstress and fsx
> will help to cover IO_URING test from fs side.
> 
> I'm not an IO_URING expert, so cc io-uring@ list, please feel free to
> tell me if you find something wrong or have any suggestions to improve
> the test.
> 
> V2 did below changes:
> 1) 1/4 change the definition of URING_ENTRIES to 1
> 2) 2/4 change the difinition of AIO_ENTRIES to 1, undo an unrelated changed line
> 3) 4/4 turn to use io_uring_prep_readv/io_uring_prep_writev, due to old
>        liburing(0.2-2) doesn't support io_uring_prep_read/io_uring_prep_write.
> 
> V3 changed io_uring_submit(&ring) to io_uring_submit_and_wait(&ring, 1). I'm
> not sure if this's the real mean of Jens Axboe's review point, please check.
>   https://marc.info/?l=fstests&m=159811932808057&w=2

Ping, any review point about this version, it only has a little change.

Thanks,
Zorro

> 
> Thanks,
> Zorro
> 
> 
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux