Re: [PATCH 1/2] fstests: update sparse file & negative timestamp tests for exfat

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fstests: update sparse file & negative timestamp tests for exfat
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 05:05:11 -0700
Cc: fstests <fstests@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <931ccb70-0b72-6532-d859-e355264d299a@sandeen.net>
References: <07e0ecad-11fd-9bc2-7e49-9470f7511b27@sandeen.net> <931ccb70-0b72-6532-d859-e355264d299a@sandeen.net>

On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 05:16:50PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> exfat cannot do sparse files or negative timestamps, so exclude
> tests which require these.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Looks good,

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

References:
- [PATCH 0/2] fstests: 2 more exfat-related fixes
  - From: Eric Sandeen
- [PATCH 1/2] fstests: update sparse file & negative timestamp tests for exfat
  - From: Eric Sandeen

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] generic/506: fix _require test, use xfs_io vs chattr
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fstests: add _require_mknod
Previous by thread: [PATCH 1/2] fstests: update sparse file & negative timestamp tests for exfat
Next by thread: [PATCH 2/2] fstests: add _require_mknod
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Filesystems Development] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux