[PATCH 0/2] fstests: 2 more exfat-related fixes

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Subject: [PATCH 0/2] fstests: 2 more exfat-related fixes
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 17:15:13 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0

Teach fstests that exfat can't do sparse files or negative timestamps
Add a new _require test to see if the filesystem can contain special device nodes (i.e. mknod works)

Follow-Ups:
- [PATCH 2/2] fstests: add _require_mknod
  - From: Eric Sandeen
- [PATCH 1/2] fstests: update sparse file & negative timestamp tests for exfat
  - From: Eric Sandeen

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/3 V2] fstests: test restricted file access sysctls
Next by Date: [PATCH 1/2] fstests: update sparse file & negative timestamp tests for exfat
Previous by thread: [PATCH 0/2] Overlayfs tests for file handle bugs
Next by thread: [PATCH 1/2] fstests: update sparse file & negative timestamp tests for exfat
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Filesystems Development] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux