On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 01:48:19PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 5/6/20 1:44 PM, Bill O'Donnell wrote: > > On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 03:20:10PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > ... > > >> +OWNER=fsgqa > >> +OTHER=fsgqa2 > > > > Why fsgqa2 instead of 123456-fsgqa? > > Thanks- > > Bill > > Yeah, not quite sure what to do about that. That username is somewhat specific > to test generic/381 because it wants to test usernames starting with digits. > I hate to proliferate required users, though, so not sure what the best way > to go might be. > > I could maybe/probably use root as one of the users, but didn't want to > over-complicate it with matching admin privs vs. normal user privs. Fair enough. THanks! Reviewed-by: Bill O'Donnell <billodo@xxxxxxxxxx> > > -Eric >
