On 5/6/20 1:44 PM, Bill O'Donnell wrote: > On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 03:20:10PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: ... >> +OWNER=fsgqa >> +OTHER=fsgqa2 > > Why fsgqa2 instead of 123456-fsgqa? > Thanks- > Bill Yeah, not quite sure what to do about that. That username is somewhat specific to test generic/381 because it wants to test usernames starting with digits. I hate to proliferate required users, though, so not sure what the best way to go might be. I could maybe/probably use root as one of the users, but didn't want to over-complicate it with matching admin privs vs. normal user privs. -Eric
