On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 04:24:29PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote: > On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 02:54:10PM -0700, Ira Weiny wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 10:53:20AM -0700, 'Ira Weiny' wrote: > > > From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Add lease tests[1] to locktest because they share so much code. Make running > > > of lease tests separate as an '-L' option. > > > > > > To make things cleaner update the lock test code and test script. This > > > includes fixing a rather serious bug. > > > > > > Finally update the error output to help identify any steps which fail during > > > testing. > > > > > > > Was there any further feedback on this series? Did it get mangled too bad to > > apply? > > Sorry, I forget to mention in last update announce that I'm on public > holiday this week and have limited internet access. I'll review this v2 > when I get back. Awesome! Have a great time! :-D > > > > > Ira > > > > > > > > Changes from V1: > > > Create a new option '-L' to run lease testing > > > Created 568 test script which shared common code with 131 > > > Moved 2 patches earlier in the series > > > [PATCH V2 09/16] src/locktest: Clean up error output > > > [PATCH V2 10/16] src/locktest: Audit all debug output > > > Added 3 patches > > > [PATCH V2 11/16] src/locktest: Add run() function > > > [PATCH V2 15/16] common/locktest: Add common locktest functions > > > [PATCH V2 16/16] generic/568: Add lease testing > > Thanks for the revision! NP, I kind of like the way it turned out. Ira
