Re: [PATCH 2/7] filter: fix assumed whitespace in _filefrag_filter regex

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On 1/21/19 5:51 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 11:33:11AM -0500, jeffm@xxxxxxxx wrote:
>> From: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@xxxxxxxx>
>>
>> The regex assumes there will be whitespace after the .. in the ranges
>> and, with larger offsets, there may not be any.
> 
> Does more than this, right?

I suppose.  It converts the interpreted .. into a literal .., which I
believe was the original intent.

>> Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@xxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  common/filter | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/common/filter b/common/filter
>> index ed082d24..b4443a34 100644
>> --- a/common/filter
>> +++ b/common/filter
>> @@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ _filter_filefrag()
>>  		next
>>  	}
>>  	($ext, $logical, $physical, $length) =
>> -		(/^\s*(\d+):\s+(\d+)..\s+\d+:\s+(\d+)..\s+\d+:\s+(\d+):/)
>> +		(/^\s*(\d+):\s+(\d+)\.\.\s*\d+:\s+(\d+)\.\.\s*\d+:\s+(\d+):/)
> 
> This is escaping "..", too, isn't it? 

Yes, but what else could the .. in the original regex have been
referring to?  I don't recall seeing any other filefrag format that
would match otherwise.

I don't have a problem documenting it further, though.

-Jeff

-- 
Jeff Mahoney
SUSE Labs



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux