Re: What's up with "locks: change POSIX lock ownership on execve when files_struct is displaced"?

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 07:51:15PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> 
> No, it's not suitable for inclusion. After I sent the above patch, I
> realized that it would break some important filesystems (like NFS).
> 
> Eric sounded like he had the best approach to fix it, but it's non-
> trivial and somewhat outside the bounds of the locking code. I haven't
> had time to attempt a patch for it so far.

Thanks, I'll suppress generic/484 for my ext4 testing for now.

	     	      		      	      - Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux