Re: [PATCH] README: document the new default run mode

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On Sat, May 05, 2018 at 10:09:11PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> t
> The 'dangerous' group and 'auto' group are not mutually exclusive when
> it was introduced, see commit 3f28d55c3954 ("add freeze and dangerouss
> groups"). But from previous discussions[1][2], they should be mutually
> exclusive.

What might be nice is if there was some way to declare that a test is
dangerous given a particular kernel version (or some combination of
kernel version and file system type).  Right now I have to manually
exclude tests when testing stable kernels, e.g.:

gce-xfstests full --kernel gs://gce-xfstests/bzImage-3.18 -X generic/269 -X ext4/022

It's not a huge deal, and it's been on my todo list to add into the
{gce,kvm,android}-xfstests framework, but perhaps it belongs in the
core xfstests framework.

						- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux