On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 11:58:59AM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 12:24:06PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 03:57:15PM +0000, Rostislav Skudnov wrote:
> > > Glibc includes linux/param.h when we include sys/param.h, whereas musl
> > > libc does not do that. HZ is a Linux-specific macro, therefore include
> > > the header file that defines it explicitly.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Rostislav Skudnov <rostislav@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Using HZ in userspace doesn't make any sense at all. The kernel HZ
> > (as in the granulairy for jiffies) can vary between architectures
> > and even configurations. I guess it wants a hard coded 100 here, but
> > someone will have to do a detailed analysis.
>
> No one is using metaperf now, all the old benchmark infrastructure was
> removed by commit b020416d51ff ("xfstests: remove bench infrastructure")
>
> I think we can remove src/metaperf.c too.
FYI I use dirperf and metaperf for standalone ismoke testing of my
kernel changes quite a lot...
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
