On my system out of 7099 fonts only 975 contain Panose information. I don't think processing this info would have much of an impact anyway but just something to keep in mind. On Thu, 2019-05-30 at 18:25 +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote: > Hi, > > We have two values in spacing property to consider if a font is > monospaced or not. FC_MONO and FC_DUAL. Right now fontconfig decides > it when: > > - single advance value available in a font -> FC_MONO > - two advance values available in a font and larger value is twice of > smaller value -> FC_DUAL > > This code worked for fonts which has smaller language coverage and > satisfy older Unicode specifications that non-Latin characters > assumes > double-widths or so. > > Nowadays, various glyphs are included in even monospaced fonts which > doesn't meet the above criteria (i.e. Noto Mono). it may be a time to > update and improve this. > > What do you think? > > I'm not sure what approach is better though, the idea that comes to > my > mind is to refer sFamilyClass and Panose values in OS2 table. if > there > are any better idea or opposed to this, please let me know. > > BTW given that we decide it like that, it isn't DUAL anymore. need a > good name for that too perhaps, but anyway. > > Regards, _______________________________________________ Fontconfig mailing list Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig
