Re: Streamlining fontconfig scanning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Behdad Esfahbod <behdad@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Anyway, we need to reach a rough consensus on which direction to go with
> this.  While the checks above sound smart, I have a hunch that keeping it
> simple results in less headache in the long term.

I suspect just disabling the blank checks would be sufficient;
applications wanting 'some' font to display a particular glyph are
probably better served by using 'sans' and expecting that the
environment will have already set that up to point to a set of fonts
which cover much of the code point space.

Anything more complicated will be harder to explain when it fails.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Fontconfig mailing list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Kernel]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Gimp Graphics Editor]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux