Behdad Esfahbod <behdad@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Anyway, we need to reach a rough consensus on which direction to go with > this. While the checks above sound smart, I have a hunch that keeping it > simple results in less headache in the long term. I suspect just disabling the blank checks would be sufficient; applications wanting 'some' font to display a particular glyph are probably better served by using 'sans' and expecting that the environment will have already set that up to point to a set of fonts which cover much of the code point space. Anything more complicated will be harder to explain when it fails. -- -keith
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Fontconfig mailing list Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig
