Re: performance issue questions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


Akira TAGOH <akira@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> The former one was what I took measures for that. I expect it works as long
> as the process is done within the most accurate time.

Is there some place we could add a suitable delay to ensure that file
system without sub-section timestamps could get reliable results using
inexpensive timestamp checking, rather than expensive file scanning? I
recall placing a 'sleep' in the cache generation code, but presumably
that's insufficient?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Fontconfig mailing list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Fonts]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Kernel]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Gimp Graphics Editor]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux