Akira TAGOH <akira@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > The former one was what I took measures for that. I expect it works as long > as the process is done within the most accurate time. Is there some place we could add a suitable delay to ensure that file system without sub-section timestamps could get reliable results using inexpensive timestamp checking, rather than expensive file scanning? I recall placing a 'sleep' in the cache generation code, but presumably that's insufficient? -- -keith
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Fontconfig mailing list Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig
