On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 1:22 AM, W. Trevor King <wking@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > So you think the: > > <page>: <mask> > > syntax is too verbose in hex? I can't think of a good alternative off Yes. it depends on how many glyphs a font has though, several tens of thousand hex code as the output is too much. > the top of my head without dropping information, and I don't think we > want different output format for: > > $ fc-list <pattern> charset > > compared to the element-less invocations. That said adding another format pattern for more details isn't that bad idea IMHO if it helps. -- Akira TAGOH _______________________________________________ Fontconfig mailing list Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig
