Akira TAGOH wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Raimund Steger <rs@xxxxxxxx <mailto:rs@xxxxxxxx>> wrote: Why not... Since interleaved <test> and <edit> were previously not even allowed by the DTD, it shouldn't have any real impact on existing configs. OK it was tolerated by fontconfig but I can't imagine this was exploited by anyone... That should be a bug if one expected it. so that should be no problem. FWIW currently fonts.dtd says: <!ELEMENT match (test*, edit*)> just wonder how useful marking "edit" as zero-or-more state is? it doesn't take any effects. we can simply ignore it. so shouldn't it be: <!ELEMENT match (test*, edit+)> and for this proposal: <!ELEMENT match (test*, edit+)+> any comments?
looks good to me. Raimund -- Worringer Str 31 Duesseldorf 40211 DE home: <rs@xxxxxxxx> +49-179-2981632 icq 16845346 work: <rs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Fontconfig mailing list Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig
