> On 07/15/2012 06:01 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: >>>> C. I tried to dispatch the Arabic variants in the Latin family they >>>> were >>>> >> designed to complement, but I may have misunderstood the design >>>> info >>>> >> available online. >>> > >>> > Please clarify 'dispatch' :-) >> Kufi with Sans (masquerading as the Arabic block of Droid Sans) and >> Naskh >> with Serif the same way (see the long fontconfig ruleset I referenced) >> >> http://www.29arabicletters.com/foundry/?m=1-1-1&fid=26 >> states Naskh was designed to complement Serif >> >> and >> https://code.google.com/p/chromium-os/issues/detail?id=17382 >> that chromium uses Kufi with Sans > > That may have been the case, but it is my personal understanding that we > should dispatch Naskh with both Sans and Serif. Kufi is a horrible font > for > body text. So make kufi a separate family and keep the old droid sans arabic for sans? Or is it also horrible in some way? Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot _______________________________________________ Fontconfig mailing list Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig
