On 07/15/2012 06:01 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: >>> C. I tried to dispatch the Arabic variants in the Latin family they were >>> >> designed to complement, but I may have misunderstood the design info >>> >> available online. >> > >> > Please clarify 'dispatch' :-) > Kufi with Sans (masquerading as the Arabic block of Droid Sans) and Naskh > with Serif the same way (see the long fontconfig ruleset I referenced) > > http://www.29arabicletters.com/foundry/?m=1-1-1&fid=26 > states Naskh was designed to complement Serif > > and > https://code.google.com/p/chromium-os/issues/detail?id=17382 > that chromium uses Kufi with Sans That may have been the case, but it is my personal understanding that we should dispatch Naskh with both Sans and Serif. Kufi is a horrible font for body text. behdad _______________________________________________ Fontconfig mailing list Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig
