do you see any downside to leave the language unspecified in the OS/2 table in the font, or, alternatively, use fc-lang data alone without looking up the OS/2 table in fontconfig to determine coverage? Keith Packard wrote: > Yes, ttf fonts have some OS/2 table bits that indicate which Han > languages they are designed to support; your font likely indicates that > it supports Chinese, so fontconfig elides the Japanese language from the > supported list, even though the font completely covers the Unicode > codepoints required by Japanese. > > _______________________________________________ Fontconfig mailing list Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig
