On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 09:33 -0500, Bob Tennent wrote: > Is the lack of "spacing=100" for Bold [Oblique] significant? If so, why > are Bold [Oblique] not properly tagged? The lack of the spacing values is significant; this value is determined by examining the font and checking the spacing of each glyph; fonts where glyphs have different spacing values will not be marked as monospace <pedant>yes, the code detects dual-spacing fonts as well</pedant>. In particular, I found Type1 variants of the Luxi fonts on my machine for which even the Roman style face is not marked as monospace. Using fontconfig 2.4.1, you could override this by editing the spacing value detected in the font with the configuration file. -- keith.packard@xxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Fontconfig mailing list Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig
