>|Why does QT (version 3.3.7) and hence KDE (version 3.5.5) not recognize >|Luxi Mono as a monospaced typeface, despite >| >| <alias> >| <family>Luxi Mono</family> >| <default><family>monospace</family></default> >| </alias> >| >| >| <alias> >| <family>monospace</family> >| <prefer> >| <family>Luxi Mono</family> >| </prefer> >| </alias> I may have (part of) the answer. Compare % fc-list "Luxi Mono" : family style file spacing /usr/share/fonts/luxi/luximbi.ttf: Luxi Mono:style=Bold Oblique /usr/share/fonts/luxi/luximr.ttf: Luxi Mono:style=Regular:spacing=100 /usr/share/fonts/luxi/luximb.ttf: Luxi Mono:style=Bold /usr/share/fonts/luxi/luximri.ttf: Luxi Mono:style=Oblique:spacing=100 and % fc-list "Courier" : family style file spacing /usr/share/fonts/AdobeType1/Courier-Oblique.pfb: Courier:style=Oblique:spacing=100 /usr/share/fonts/AdobeType1/Courier-BoldOblique.pfb: Courier:style=Bold Oblique:spacing=100 /usr/share/fonts/AdobeType1/Courier-Bold.pfb: Courier:style=Bold:spacing=100 /usr/share/fonts/AdobeType1/Courier.pfb: Courier:style=Regular:spacing=100 Is the lack of "spacing=100" for Bold [Oblique] significant? If so, why are Bold [Oblique] not properly tagged? Bob T. _______________________________________________ Fontconfig mailing list Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig
