Patrick Lam <plam@xxxxxxx> さんは書きました: > Mike FABIAN wrote: >>>Why would you want to do that? It seems like it would be flawed unless >>>you got a canonical path for the directory anyway. >> >> >> Only because it used to work like that and it is a bit confusing if >> the behaviour changes suddenly. >> >> To get information about unknown fonts, I used to put them in some >> temporary directory and call "fc-cache ." there, then I looked into >> the cache file. >> >> As the caches are now (usually) generated in /var/cache/fontconfig, it >> has become a bit inconvenient anyway to find out which cache file >> belongs to which directory, therefore I guess you are right that it >> doesn't matter to loose that behaviour. >> >> If I want to check what cache files are generated for some new, >> unknown fonts, I'll have to add the temporary directory to >> ~/.fonts.conf now. >> >> That's no big problem, therefore I think you are right that we >> can forget about directories which are not subdirectories of >> directories listed in a .conf file. > > What about if fc-cat . did what you wanted? That would be nice! > I think that would be helpful, although I'm trying to fix the issues > with the cache file directories first; Yes, that's urgent. > it would be great if someone else made fc-cat work to > print out directory font information. -- Mike FABIAN <mfabian@xxxxxxx> http://www.suse.de/~mfabian 睡眠不足はいい仕事の敵だ。 _______________________________________________ Fontconfig mailing list Fontconfig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/fontconfig
