Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] stat: rename add_lat_percentile_sample_noprio()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2021/11/23 23:27, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> From: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@xxxxxxx>
> 
> add_lat_percentile_sample_noprio() is the regular function to add a latency
> percentile sample. It adds a regular sample (it doesn't add any per
> priority sample). Therefore, it makes sense that this function has no
> suffix, neither _noprio nor _prio.
> 
> Drop the _noprio suffix from add_lat_percentile_sample_noprio(), to make it
> more obvious that this function should be used if you want to add a regular
> percentile sample.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  stat.c | 11 ++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/stat.c b/stat.c
> index f5d5cd24..4eeb1c02 100644
> --- a/stat.c
> +++ b/stat.c
> @@ -3052,8 +3052,9 @@ void add_sync_clat_sample(struct thread_stat *ts, unsigned long long nsec)
>  	add_stat_sample(&ts->sync_stat, nsec);
>  }
>  
> -static void add_lat_percentile_sample_noprio(struct thread_stat *ts,
> -				unsigned long long nsec, enum fio_ddir ddir, enum fio_lat lat)
> +static void add_lat_percentile_sample(struct thread_stat *ts,
> +				      unsigned long long nsec,
> +				      enum fio_ddir ddir, enum fio_lat lat)
>  {
>  	unsigned int idx = plat_val_to_idx(nsec);
>  	assert(idx < FIO_IO_U_PLAT_NR);
> @@ -3068,7 +3069,7 @@ static void add_lat_percentile_prio_sample(struct thread_stat *ts,
>  {
>  	unsigned int idx = plat_val_to_idx(nsec);
>  
> -	add_lat_percentile_sample_noprio(ts, nsec, ddir, lat);
> +	add_lat_percentile_sample(ts, nsec, ddir, lat);
>  
>  	if (!high_prio)
>  		ts->io_u_plat_low_prio[ddir][idx]++;
> @@ -3118,7 +3119,7 @@ void add_clat_sample(struct thread_data *td, enum fio_ddir ddir,
>  		 * when lat_percentiles=1).
>  		 */
>  		if (ts->lat_percentiles)
> -			add_lat_percentile_sample_noprio(ts, nsec, ddir, FIO_CLAT);
> +			add_lat_percentile_sample(ts, nsec, ddir, FIO_CLAT);
>  		else
>  			add_lat_percentile_prio_sample(ts, nsec, ddir, high_prio,
>  						       FIO_CLAT);
> @@ -3186,7 +3187,7 @@ void add_slat_sample(struct thread_data *td, enum fio_ddir ddir,
>  			       offset, ioprio);
>  
>  	if (ts->slat_percentiles)
> -		add_lat_percentile_sample_noprio(ts, nsec, ddir, FIO_SLAT);
> +		add_lat_percentile_sample(ts, nsec, ddir, FIO_SLAT);
>  
>  	if (needs_lock)
>  		__td_io_u_unlock(td);
> 

Looks good.

Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux