RE: U.2 vs M.2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Mauricio, You got it correct, M.2 is typically designed for consumer(laptop), desktop, I have seen M.2 in the back of the server for dual boot drives too.

U.2 brings more surface area to the equation, so a beefier (hotter) controller could push more NAND. 

Better management, so you can do warm safe removal. 

U.2 could be added to a card so you could use a PCIe slot with it. 

Or you could leverage something like this... https://www.liqid.com/products/composable-storage/element-lqd3000-aic-pcie-ssd

Which leverages M.2 to build a really fast PCIe Card...
Frank



-----Original Message-----
From: fio-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <fio-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Mauricio Tavares
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2020 11:02 AM
To: fio <fio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: U.2 vs M.2

This might be a bit off-topic, but what is the difference performance between those two as far as the nvme drives are concerned? All I know is I see M.2 being used for customer/prosumer-level stuff while the
U.2 in enterprisy drives (ok boot disks in the servers might be M.2 but you get my drift).




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux