Re: LBA selection in FIO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

What version of fio are you using? Here's what I got with post fio 3.3
with --buffer_pattern=0:

$ ./fio --gtod_reduce=1 --filename=/tmp/fio.tmp --size=4k
--buffer_pattern=0 --name=zero --rw=write
zero: (g=0): rw=write, bs=(R) 4096B-4096B, (W) 4096B-4096B, (T)
4096B-4096B, ioengine=psync, iodepth=1
fio-3.3-17-gdb43a
Starting 1 process

zero: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err= 0: pid=10681: Thu Jan  4 06:40:44 2018
  write: IOPS=1000, BW=4000KiB/s (4096kB/s)(4096B/1msec)
  cpu          : usr=0.00%, sys=0.00%, ctx=0, majf=0, minf=77
  IO depths    : 1=100.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     issued rwt: total=0,1,0, short=0,0,0, dropped=0,0,0
     latency   : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=1

Run status group 0 (all jobs):
  WRITE: bw=4000KiB/s (4096kB/s), 4000KiB/s-4000KiB/s
(4096kB/s-4096kB/s), io=4096B (4096B), run=1-1msec
$ hexdump -C /tmp/fio.tmp
00000000  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
*
00001000

--buffer_pattern=0x0 also works without issue for me. If you're able
to reproduce the problem with fio 3.3 or above then can you post the
command line + job file you're using?

On 3 January 2018 at 21:12, Gnana Sekhar <kgsgnana2020@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I did try the buffer pattern of 0x0 and it doesn't work
> fio throws out error of "failed parsing pattern `0x0`"
>
> Regards,
> Gnana
>
> On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi Gnana,
>>
>> On 3 January 2018 at 17:47, Gnana Sekhar <kgsgnana2020@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Basically I am looking to see if FIO has the below option
>>> 1. Pass the LBA count as an argument. From your explanation my
>>> understanding is currently FIO doesn't have that option
>>
>> Well I'm still unsure what LBA count means in this context. If my
>> blocks are 512 bytes big and I want a single write to cover LBA 0 - 3
>> then isn't the blocksize of 4k controlling the LBA count? Sorry to
>> keep asking I just don't understand the request.
>>
>>> 2. On the buffer pattern I wasn't able to specify the buffer pattern
>>> to be all 0(zero) but --buffer_pattern=1 works fine. Do I have to use
>>> zero_buffers to fill buffers with zero and not buffer_pattern
>>
>> Hmm! 0 is going to be interpreted as "this option is unset". Does 0x0 work?

-- 
Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux