RE: FIO windows

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I assume you want me to change the size parameter with a 64k blocksize as everything is working with 16k blocksize?

-----Original Message-----
From: Sitsofe Wheeler [mailto:sitsofe@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 2:54 PM
To: David Hare <david.hare@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>; fio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: FIO windows

Hi,

Can you add unlink=1 and keep reducing the size parameter (e.g. down to 128m then down to 16m then down to 4m then down to 1m then down to 512k etc)?

Can you attach the full output that's produced it fails with this reduced job?

IF you are make the problem happen with very little I/O being done (i.e. the job bombs out after doing less than 1MiBytes worth of I/O) you can try adding --debug=all to the job and seeing if that offers any clues as to what the last thing it was doing was?

On 31 October 2017 at 21:46, David Hare <david.hare@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It was ok with or without the colon, the size didn’t seem to make a 
> difference, but blocksize did.. see the commented block sizes below.
>
> fio2.fio
> [global]
>
> ioengine=windowsaio
>
> ;blocksize=64k - error
> ;blocksize=32k - error
> ;blocksize=16k - no error
>
> blocksize=16k
>
> direct=1
>
> thread
>
> size=512g
>
>
>
> time_based
> runtime=10
>
> [asdf]
> filename=F\:\\testfile:G\:\\testfile:H\:\\testfile:I\:\\testfile:J\:\\
> testfile:K\:\\testfile:L\:\\testfile:M\:\\testfile:P\:\\testfile
>
> Results:
> Run status group 0 (all jobs):
> READ: bw=141MiB/s (148MB/s), 141MiB/s-141MiB/s (148MB/s-148MB/s), 
> io=1413MiB (1481MB), run=10001-10001msec
>
>
> -Dave
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sitsofe Wheeler [mailto:sitsofe@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 2:28 PM
> To: David Hare <david.hare@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>; fio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: FIO windows
>
> Hi,
>
> On 31 October 2017 at 20:46, David Hare <david.hare@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> If I remove - "blocksize=64k" "direct=1" "thread=8" "size=1g"
>> "time_based with runtime=10" or ":P\:\\testfile:" (the 9th drive) the 
>> file works.
>>
>> The below file generates this error:
>> fio: pid=8404, err=22/file:ioengines.c:333, func=td_io_queue, 
>> error=Invalid argument
>> asdf: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err=22 (file:ioengines.c:333, 
>> func=td_io_queue, error=Invalid argument): pid=8404: Tue Oct 31
>>
>>
>> [global]
>>
>> ioengine=windowsaio
>> blocksize=64k
>> direct=1
>>
>> thread=8
>> size=1g
>>
>> time_based
>> runtime=10
>>
>> [asdf]
>>
>> filename=F\:\\testfile:G\:\\testfile:H\:\\testfile:I\:\\testfile:J\:\\testfile:K\:\\testfile:L\:\\testfile:M\:\\testfile:P\:\\testfile:
>
> "thread=8" should be the same as using "thread" and would be required 
> on Windows. "P\:\\testfile:" should be "P\:\\testfile" (note the lack 
> of trailing colon - see the examples in 
> http://fio.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fio_doc.html#cmdoption-arg-filenam
> e ). time_based and runtime sound required. Perhaps a smaller 
> blocksize means it takes longer than 10 seconds to hit the problem - 
> presumably blocksize=128k is still as problematic? I'm also assuming 
> the problem still happens with size=512m ?
>
> --
> Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/
>
>
> Disclaimer
>
> The information contained in this communication from the sender is 
> confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and 
> others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are 
> hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking 
> action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly 
> prohibited and may be unlawful.



--
Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/

��.n��������+%������w��{.n�������^n�r������&��z�ޗ�zf���h���~����������_��+v���)ߣ�

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux