Re: [PATCH 3/4] lib/memalign: don't malloc size twice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/18/2017 11:53 AM, kusumi.tomohiro@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Tomohiro Kusumi <tkusumi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The footer offset (diff between malloc'd address and aligned address)
> is (alignment-1) at most, and footer appears `size' bytes after the
> aligned address, thus required size is (alignment-1 + size + sizeof(*f)).
> 
> The existing code seems to allocate extra unused `size' bytes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Kusumi <tkusumi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  lib/memalign.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/memalign.c b/lib/memalign.c
> index 137cc8e..bfbd1e8 100644
> --- a/lib/memalign.c
> +++ b/lib/memalign.c
> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ void *fio_memalign(size_t alignment, size_t size)
>  
>  	assert(!(alignment & (alignment - 1)));
>  
> -	ptr = malloc(size + alignment + size + sizeof(*f) - 1);
> +	ptr = malloc(size + alignment + sizeof(*f) - 1);

That does look like a mistake, there's no need to account 'size' twice.
Applied.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux