On 24 February 2017 at 17:23, Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'm going to guess that NetBSD doesn't behave this way based on the > result reported by > https://lists.cairographics.org/archives/cairo/2012-October/023652.html > . Additionally in > https://lists.cairographics.org/archives/cairo/2012-October/023652.html > you can see the configure test cairo uses to determine how the > platform behaves with regard to attaching to removed segments. FWIW Oops, that second link should have been https://lists.cairographics.org/archives/cairo/2012-October/023650.html ("[cairo] [PATCH] xlib/shm: Sync the XShmAttach before removing the ShmSegment id"). -- Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
