On 24 February 2017 at 16:35, Tomohiro Kusumi <tkusumi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > As 97900ebf itself explains, this is a runtime tunable on FreeBSD > and DragonFlyBSD, so they need to check the sysctl on runtime. > > Not sure if OpenBSD has any tunable for this as the original commit > only says about >=5.1, but afaik recent versions of OpenBSD can't I'm not aware of any tunable for this on OpenBSD - only that the behaviour is listed as changing in 5.1. > even compile fio anyway. Also not sure how it works on NetBSD, and > the original commit said nothing about it too. I'm going to guess that NetBSD doesn't behave this way based on the result reported by https://lists.cairographics.org/archives/cairo/2012-October/023652.html . Additionally in https://lists.cairographics.org/archives/cairo/2012-October/023652.html you can see the configure test cairo uses to determine how the platform behaves with regard to attaching to removed segments. FWIW OSX 10.12 lacks the desired behaviour according to the result of the cairo test. -- Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
