Re: fio signal 11

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9 June 2016 at 22:58, Jeff Furlong <jeff.furlong@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Using the latest version from git, I am getting a signal 11 error when running some workloads.  It may be that workloads fail when we wrap around the device capacity (e.g. runtime and time_based).  See below example parameters:
>
> # fio --name=test_job --ioengine=libaio --direct=1 --rw=write --iodepth=32 --size=100% --numjobs=1 --bs=1m --filename=/dev/nvme0n1 --group_reporting --write_bw_log=test_job --write_iops_log=test_job --write_lat_log=test_job --log_avg_msec=1000 --disable_lat=0 --disable_clat=0 --disable_slat=0 --runtime=1500s --time_based --ramp_time=5s --output=test_job
>
> fio-2.11-17-ga275
> Starting 1 process
> fio: pid=145763, got signal=11

Could you run fio under gdb (
gdb ./fio
run --name=test_job --ioengine=libaio etc.
)

and when it crashes get a backtrace with
thread apply all bt
?

-- 
Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux