Wired Latency Reporting in the FIO results

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Would you please kindly let me know what is the difference between
disable_lat and disable_clat options ?

I have run a test job with disable_clat=1 and disable_slat=1 and got
following lat results:

   lat (msec): min=309, max=30312, avg=15285.13, stdev=8664.28
   READ: io=15658MB, aggrb=534390KB/s, minb=534390KB/s,
maxb=534390KB/s, mint=30004msec, maxt=30004msec


These results are certainly wrong because my storage has faster
response time than reported 15 seconds avg lat. 15 seconds avg lat is
certainly noticeable in run time if that was the case.

Then, I have enabled clat and slat and got following results:

    slat (usec): min=2, max=31893, avg= 7.78, stdev=50.65
    clat (usec): min=218, max=73714, avg=3813.82, stdev=3948.53
     lat (usec): min=262, max=73718, avg=3821.84, stdev=3947.77
     READ: io=15694MB, aggrb=535627KB/s, minb=535627KB/s,
maxb=535627KB/s, mint=30003msec, maxt=30003msec

These results are making more sense. However, my intention was to cut
some gettimeofday() overhead by disabling clat and slat. Which seems
for some reason my logic is not correct.

I appreciate your input,
--Alireza
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux