I'd add the time_based option in there. May not be needed now but if you start tweaking things it could come up later. Daniel On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 4:51 AM, Michael Weinrich <micxer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yeah, well, I needed a process that writes to the same files the others are > reading from to somehow simulate expiring local caches (and to see, if NFS > handles that the right way). And yes, it took me quite some time to dig > through most of the options to tailor the tests to my needs > > But I'm also glad to hear, that it doesn't look completely wrong for a first > try :-) > > > Am 20.05.2015 um 11:03 schrieb Sitsofe Wheeler: >> >> On 17 May 2015 at 21:55, Michael Weinrich <micxer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Thanks for the hint. I also found another mistake in limiting the reads >>> and >>> writes where I only wanted to limit the writes and have the reads as fast >>> as >>> possible. But in general this is a viable approach to my problem? >> >> I can't say for sure whether it models your workload (your example >> made use of options I had to look up!) but it does look like an >> interesting approach... >> > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
