Re: Scramble buffers not set by default unless set explicitly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/20/2014 09:32 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> A change (1bf2498d311155bc4eb43edb4e6d3a04845d94c5) to make scramble buffers easier to understand appears to have made scramble buffers not the default behavior by accident.  The logic would always evaluate such that scramble buffers is not used unless set explicitly.
> 
> I think the following little patch changes the logic to what was intended.

Oops, yes that was unintended. Your fix doesn't work for zero enabled
and scramble not set, however. I've checked in a two prong approach:

http://git.kernel.dk/?p=fio.git;a=commit;h=b04f590551050b23768a3969d47371d363aa8745

please let me know if that work as intended for you.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux