Re: Limit LBA Range

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 29 September 2014 22:10, Jon Tango <cheerios123@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I include both of those commands, in addition to size=745g, and it seems to
> be conducting the workload over the entire LBA range. Is this the correct
> combination of the three parameters? Here is the test script:
>
>  [global]
> name=4ktest
> filename=\\.\physicaldrive1
> direct=1
> numjobs=8
> norandommap
> ba=4k
> time_based
> size=745g
> log_avg_msec=100000
> group_reporting=1
> #########################################################
>
> [4K Precon]
> stonewall
> runtime=15000
> iodepth=32
> bs=4k
> rw=randwrite

Bear in mind that because you are asking for eight stonewalled jobs
this fio run will take 8 * 15000 seconds (around 33 hours) to finish
because after the first job has run for four hours the second job will
start etc.

-- 
Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux