Re: Rip out verify_backlog support?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 05 2014, Grant Grundler wrote:
> > It does - that's the log_io_piece() mechanism. The writer will generate
> > on, and verify will read those and verify. We just have to ensure that
> > it is correct in the way that it is logged. The alternative would be to
> > rely purely on the generator rollback, and for that you would then need
> > some specific notification on how far the reader could proceed, if async
> > verify_backlog is used.
> 
> Yes - I was referring to the "rely purely on generator rollback".
> 
> Once log_io_piece() is called, the verify code assumes the IO is
> complete...which isn't true if log_io_piece() is used to record "order
> issued".

Right, we'd need to ensure the state is accurately known to the
verifier.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux