Re: Definition of IO depth distribution in the terse output

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 07/26/2013 08:51 AM, asomers@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> I still don't understand how there isn't a gap.  Are you saying that
>> the buckets go like this:
>> <=1, >=2, >=4, >=8, >=16, >=32, >=64 ?
>>
>> Is the lowest bucket misnamed, or is there a gap between 1 and 2?
>
> Bucket0         1

Should this be 0..1?  Or is there some guarantee that there will
always be at least one outstanding IO?

> Bucket1         2..3
> Bucket2         4..7
> Bucket3         8..15
> Bucket4         16..31
> Bucket5         32..63
> Bucket6         64..
>
> --
> Jens Axboe
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux