Re: Definition of IO depth distribution in the terse output

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I still don't understand how there isn't a gap.  Are you saying that
the buckets go like this:
<=1, >=2, >=4, >=8, >=16, >=32, >=64 ?

Is the lowest bucket misnamed, or is there a gap between 1 and 2?

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:10 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25 2013, asomers@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> The man page section for the terse output format describes the IO
>> depth distribution fields as "<=1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, >=64".  Should the
>> last entry be ">32" instead?  Similarly, in the section for IO latency
>> distribution, should the final value be ">2000" instead of ">=2000"?
>
> The bucket named 32 is 32 and up (but not including) 64. And so forth.
>
> --
> Jens Axboe
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux