I have a couple of questions:
1) if it is normal (and if so, why) that while running a number of identical jobs (e.g 4), each bound to a different CPU (cpu_allowed=i) and each performing sequential (bs=512) reads on (e.g. 4) different HD, fio reports IOPS numbers that are highly unbalanced among HD with one HD reporting more than 7x of the IOPS of the minimum IOPS HD.
Different runs may show most of the IOPS on a different HD, so it's not that one HD is faster.
Here are some possibly interesting parameters:
ioengine=libaio
iodepth=32
direct=1
2) why increasing "iodepth' (eg to 512) decreses the IOPS results significantly (by 10x)?
thanks,
John
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
