On 2010-11-10 09:22, Sebastian Kayser wrote: > Hi John, > > * John Cagle <jcagle@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Is your iSCSI target also in a virtual machine? If so, maybe the >> hypervisor (vmware? kvm?) is caching the 10GB volume that is being >> used by the iSCSI target? > > thanks for answering. No hypervisor involved on the iSCSI target, it's > an oldish Infortrend storage [1] for which I am trying to determine the > performance profile. Anything else along the stack that might skew the > test results? > > Just to make sure my understanding is correct: > - direct=1 should mitigate (disable?) OS caching effects > - sync=1, iodepth=1 should make sure that an I/O has really made it to > disk before the next on is issued, i.e. should de-facto disable > I/O coalescing or device caching > > Are these sane/valid assumptions? Yes, your assumptions are valid. I think the issue here is that you give randwrite, but don't also specify that you want overwrites. So what happens is that the file will be truncated and then randomly written, allowing the file system to place randomly chosen file block together. If you remove the test file and re-run with overwrite=1 added, then see if those results are more in line with what you expect. -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
