On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 17:47 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > > Is the fact that Fedora release guidelines include Xen _guest_ support > > but not full _host_ functionalities going to be an issue if/when we > > decide to try influencing this > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SecureBoot ? > > > > I think the guideline including only Xen _guest_ support is from the time > when dom0 support really wasn't usable in upstream Linux kernel. > Makes sense. > Now dom0 is obviously supported in upstream Linux, so we should get > dom0 support to the guidelines aswell. > That would be something really nice. Even independently from the UEFI stuff, I'm definitely all for it! :-) Thanks and Regards, Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://retis.sssup.it/people/faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- xen mailing list xen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen
